![]() ![]() The Court of Appeals dismissed this certiorari motion and also denied reconsideration thereof.įlores also filed an administrative proceeding against Judge Regino in relation to his order dated April 16, 1990.įlores also filed in the Office of the Ombudsman a complaint against Judge Abesamis, with respect to his orders of February 16, June 6, and December 10, 1990. ![]() Flores’s motion for reconsideration was denied by order dated Jof Judge Abesamis who had by then returned to duty.įlores challenged these three orders - of Febru(of Abesamis), of Ap(of Regino) and of J(of Abesamis) - in a certiorari suit filed with the Court of Appeals, docketed as CA-G.R. In his order of April 16, 1990, Judge Regino ruled that Ligon’s lawful acquisition of title of the cockpit and Flores’s continuing failure to pay his debt of P1.8 million to the former were supervening events warranting Ligon’s retention of the cockpit and precluding its restoration to Flores. That order was upheld by Judge Teodoro Regino, Abesamis’s pair judge, who acted on a subsequent motion of Flores to get back the cockpit while Abesamis was on leave. Judge Abesamis sustained Ligon’s contention, in an order dated February 16, 1990. Ligon pointed out that since he had become the owner of the cockpit, his right of possession must be deemed superior to that of Flores, lessee of the former owner. RTJ-89-348) against Judge Abesamis, accusing him of partiality, evident bad faith, and gross negligence, as well as of serious misconduct, inefficiency and ignorance of the law, in deliberately delaying action on his motions to obtain possession of the cockpit. Q-45825 itself.Īlthough aware of these circumstances, Flores filed criminal and administrative cases (A.M. 84644, not lifted until October 1989, and 3) the pendency in Civil Case No. 14588, which was not lifted until Novem2) a temporary restraining order issued on Decemby the Second Division of the Supreme Court in G.R. But the enforcement of the alias writ of execution was delayed by: 1) a temporary restraining order issued by the Court of Appeals on Octoin CA-G.R. 10259, he ordered the issuance of an alias writ of execution to revert possession of the cockpit to Flores. ![]() When Judge Abesamis received the notice of the judgment in the consolidated cases of CA-G.R. Flores was unable to regain possession of the cockpit because of Ligon’s actions in the Court of Appeals. His motion was granted by Judge Abesamis. In light of the favorable decision of the Court of Appeals, Flores asked the trial court to restore possession of the cockpit to him. To nullify the writ of execution, Flores filed a certiorari action in the Court of Appeals, which ruled that Flores had not infringed the compromise judgment. Q-45825, a judgment based on compromise was rendered, providing for the payment of the indebtedness of Flores to the plaintiff, Rolando Ligon, in installment.įlores breached the compromise judgment and the trial court ordered the execution thereof a writ of execution issued. This procedure is associated with modest long-term survival (54%) but with adequate preserved normal renal function in two thirds of the infants among fetuses with PUV.In Civil Case No. Among the infants with PUV, 17/30 (56.7%) infants survived, and 13/17 (76.5%) had normal renal function at 1 year of life 15/28 (53.6%) infants survived, and 11/15 (73.3%) had normal renal function at 2 years.įetal cystoscopy is accurate in the diagnosis of the etiology of LUTO and serves as a guide to the specific prenatal treatment. One fetus with US underwent urethral stenting and survived with normal renal function at 2 years of life. Fetal cystoscopy was accurate in the diagnosis of the etiology of LUTO in 32/35 (91.4%). Two fetuses had trisomy 18 diagnosed after fetal cystoscopy and were excluded from the present analysis. Fetal diagnostic cystoscopy was performed to determine prenatally the cause of LUTO and to ablate the posterior urethral valves (PUV).Ī total of 50 fetal cystoscopies were performed, revealing PUV in 31 (62%) fetuses, urethral atresia (UA) in 14 (28%) fetuses, and urethral stenosis (US) in 5 (10%) fetuses. This is a retrospective cohort study of all fetuses who underwent cystoscopy for prenatal diagnosis of LUTO in three tertiary referral centers. Our objective is to report long-term outcome after fetal cystoscopy for lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO), as well as to investigate the accuracy of fetal cystoscopy in diagnosing the cause of bladder outlet obstruction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |